|
DCCOMICS-ON-FILM.COM   BATMAN-IN-COMICS.COM THESPIRIT-ON-FILM.COM   ON-FILM.NET |
|
|
|
So my disguise must be able to strike terror into their hearts. I must be a creature of the night. Black. Terrible. I shall become A BAT!” -- Bruce Wayne, DETECTIVE COMICS #33 (November 1939)
"BATMAN ON FILM" -- The 40s Serials
(EDITOR’S NOTE: While we aspire to be historically as accurate as possible, rumor is used at times when it is of historical significance. There also may be an element of the author’s opinion found at times in these articles.)
Since The Batman was created in 1939, he has graced the silver screen a total of eight times (and counting). There are basically four eras of Batman on film: The 40s serials; The 60s feature film (based on the hit TV show); The Warner Bros. Burton/Schumacher series; and the current Warner Bros. Nolan series. Let’s take a look at the cinematic history of The Batman and we'll start at the beginning -- The 1940s Serials.
THE BATMAN (1943) Just four years after his creation, Batman made his way to the big screen in the 1943 Columbia Pictures serial BATMAN. This 15 chapter serial starred Lewis Wilson as The Batman and Douglas Croft as Robin. In fact, The Batman was the first DC Comics character to hit the big screen in serial form.
Also, as author Mark S. Reinhart points out in THE BATMAN FILMOGRAPHY (Read the OFFICIAL BOF REVIEW of THE BATMAN by Mark S. Reinhart.)
BATMAN AND ROBIN (1949) The “sequel,” if you will, to BATMAN was yet another Columbia serial titled BATMAN AND ROBIN. Released in 1949, this picture recast the two main roles: Batman was played by Robert Lowery, while Robin was portrayed by Johnny Duncan.
B&R ‘49 had a lower budget than THE BATMAN, so it comes off even cheaper and cheesier looking than the 1943 BATMAN. Like in BATMAN, there was no Batmobile for The Batman in B&R. In the former, he tooled around town in a black Cadillac. In ‘49, he was given a Mercury convertible. What is even more preposterous is that Bruce Wayne and Dick Grayson drove the same vehicles as Batman and Robin! I guess no one in Gotham back in the 40s could put 2 and 2 together.
The bottom line with both THE BATMAN and BATMAN AND ROBIN is that they are two poorly made Bat-flicks. They are so bad and so cheap-looking, that they come off as a comedy! But it was the 40s and how "serious" did anyone take "comic book movies?" However, the significance of both these serials is not the quality of each (or lack thereof), but the fact that they were the first two live-action depictions of The Batman on film. They should not be overlooked when one studies the great history of The Batman. (Read OFFICIAL BOF REVIEW of B&R '49 by Mark S. Reinhart.)
"Jett" is the editor-in-chief of BATMAN ON FILM.
RESOURCES
1. Daniels, Les. BATMAN: THE COMPLETE HISTORY
|
|